Princess Diana: Headway Lunch, 1993

Princess Diana (Diana, Princess of Wales) was the first wife of Prince Charles. Her youth and beauty made her an one of the most popular royals, but the couple separated in 1992 and divorced in 1996. Diana was killed in a car crash in Paris in August 1997. She was survived by her two sons, Prince William (1982) and Prince Harry (1984).

In this speech at the Headway Club she surprised Britain by announcing her withdrawal from public life.

The transcript is from TheRoyalForums.com website. The footage and transcript are not in the same order, and neither seems complete.

Princess Diana: …however, life and circumstances alter and I hope you will forgive me if I use this opportunity to share with you my plans for the future which now indeed have changed.

When I started my public life, twelve years ago, I understood the media might be interested in what I did. I realised then their attention would inevitably focus on both our private and public lives.

But I was not aware of how overwhelming that attention would become. Nor the extent to which it would affect both my public duties and my personal life, in a manner that’s been hard to bear.

Over the next few months I will be seeking a more suitable way of combining a meaningful public role, with hopefully, a more private life.

My first priority will continue to be our children, William and Harry, who deserve as much love, and care, and attention as I am able to give, as well as an appreciation of the tradition into which they were born.

[To the wider public, may I say that I’ve made many friends.] I’ve been allowed to share your thoughts and dreams, your disappointments and your happiness. You have also given me an education by teaching me more about life and living than any books or teachers could have done. My debt of gratitude to you all is immense. I hope, in some small way, I’ve been of service in return.

Aung San Suu Kyi: Davos (January 2011)

Aung San Suu Kyi is a Burmese politician and a leader of the opposition party. This speech was sent to the World Economic Council at Davos, Switzerland, in January 2011.

The complete transcript is available at the BBC website.

Aung San Suu Kyi : Over the past few years, despite my isolation from much of the world, I have been able to follow closely the global response to the economic downturn through listening assiduously to radio broadcasts. While the challenges were immense, the response was both swift and strong. Of course much still remains to be done. Our global interdependence has compelled and resulted in increased cooperation.

In this context, however, I would like to speak on behalf of the 55 million people of Burma who have for the most part been left behind. We yearn to be a part of the global community: not only to be economically and socially connected, but also to achieve the domestic political stability and national reconciliation that would enable us to fully address the needs of our people.

Economic policies linked to human development and capacity buildings are the best path to the achievement of stability in a democratic transition. We have already missed so many opportunities because of political conflicts in our country over the last 50 years. Despite an abundance of natural resources, Burma’s development has lagged far behind its neighbours. Our government annually spend about 40 percent of our GDP on the military and barely two percent on health and education combined.

The young people of Burma need the kind of education that has enabled Young Global Leaders, some of whom are present at this gathering, to excel so early in their careers. We need investments in technology and infrastructure. We need to counter and eventually eradicate widespread poverty by offering opportunities that will allow the entrepreneurial spirit of our people to be gainfully harnessed through micro lending programmes. The National League for Democracy (NLD) has in fact embarked on an experimental micro credit scheme on a very small scale.

We need to address the tragic consequences of preventable diseases, particularly in conflict zones and rural areas. At the same time, we also need to pay close attention to the costs and collateral damage of our development, whether environmental or social. These however can be contained if we plan ahead responsibly. In addition to these enormous challenges, we also need to reform our legal system that we might be able to attract foreign direct investment and guarantee the rule of law.

I believe that as necessary steps towards integration within the global community Burma must achieve national reconciliation, political stability, and economic growth grounded in human resources development. Without the first two which are essential for the basic requirements of good governance such as transparency, accountability, credibility and integrity, social and economic development will remain mere pipe dreams.

I would like to request those who have invested or who are thinking of investing in Burma to put a premium on respect for the law, on environmental and social factors, on the rights of workers, on job creation and on the promotion of technological skills. Such an approach would not only be in line with a global sense of responsibility, it would lead in the long run to greater benefits for all concerned.

I look forward to the day when there will be a political and social environment that is favourable to a wide range of investments in Burma. We are certainly in need of innovation and diversification if our country is to fulfil the aspirations of its people and catch up with the rest of the world.

I would like to appeal to all those present at this gathering to use their particular opportunities and skills as far as possible to promote national reconciliation, genuine democratization, human development and economic growth in Burma that our people may in turn be able to make their own contribution towards a safer happier world.

Lady Gaga: Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: “Prime Rib” Maine 2010

Lady Gaga is an American singer and songwriter. In this September 2010 speech she argues against the policy in the US military of gay servicemen and women having to leave the military if they were open about their sexuality.

The complete transcript is available at the MTV website.

A video with better quality audio is available on the WMTWTV Youtube channel.

Lady Gaga : Good afternoon. Can you all hear me?

I wrote this speech, this address, myself, (Video starts here) I’ve spent 48 hours trying to find the perfect thing to say. My address to you today is called “The Prime Rib of America.”

I do, solemnly swear, or affirm, that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies foreign and domestic, and I will bear true faith and allegiance to do the same, and I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the uniform code of military justice, so help me God.

Unless, there’s a gay soldier in my unit, sir.

That is the oath taken every day by service members of the Armed Forces when they enlist to serve their country. Equality is the prime rib of America, but because I’m gay, I don’t get to enjoy the greatest cut of meat my country has to offer. There are amazing heroes here today, whose stories are more powerful that any story I could tell, any fight I’ve ever fought, and any song that I could tell. I’m here because they inspire me. I’m here because I believe in them. I’m here because “don’t ask, don’t tell” is wrong. … It’s unjust, and fundamentally, it is against all that we stand for as Americans.

The Pentagon and senators such as John McCain have cited that the military is a unique institution, they have cited that homosexuals serving openly cause disruption to unit cohesion and morale. So what this means is, that they’re saying that straight soldiers feel uncomfortable around gay soldiers, and sometimes it causes tension, hostility and possible performance inadequacies for straight soldiers who are homophobic. And even though some studies have been done to show an overwhelming and remarkable lack of disruption to units with gay soldiers, I will, for a moment, entertain this debate. As I am less concerned with refuting the fact that, in the workplace, in any workplace, there are tensions, there is even more of a possibility to have tension when you’re fighting for your life. But I’m more concerned that John McCain and other Republican senators are using homophobia as a defense in their argument. As the nexus of this law, openly gay soldiers affect unit cohesion, like it’s OK to discriminate or discharge gay soldiers because we are homophobic, we are uncomfortable, and we do not agree with homosexuality, and I can’t focus on the field of duty when I am fighting. “We have a problem with you.” Wasn’t that the defense of Matthew Shepard’s murderers? When they left him to die on a fence in Laramie, they told the judge, ‘Oh, Matthew’s gay, and it made us uncomfortable, so we killed him.’ ‘Oh, he’s gay, it makes me uncomfortable, send him home.’ As a side note, both Matthew Shepard’s killers have life sentences in prison, and laws have since been passed that homophobia cannot be used as defense anymore in hate crimes in our judicial system.

Doesn’t it seem to be that “don’t ask, don’t tell” is backwards? Doesn’t it seem to be that, based on the Constitution of the United States, that we’re penalizing the wrong soldier? Doesn’t it seem to you that we should send home the prejudiced, the straight soldier who hates the gay soldier, the straight soldier whose performance in the military is affected because he is homophobic, the straight soldier who has prejudice in his heart, in the space where the military asks him to hold our core American values, he instead holds and harbors hate, and he gets to stay and fight for our country? He gets the honor, but we gay soldiers, who harbor no hatred, no prejudice, no phobia, we’re sent home? I am here today because I would like to propose a new law; a law that sends home the soldier that has the problem. Our new law is called “if you don’t like it, go home.” A law that discharges the soldier with the issue, the law that discharges the soldier with the real problem, the homophobic soldier that has the real negative effect on unit cohesion. A law that sends home the homophobe, a law that sends home the prejudiced. A law that doesn’t prosecute the gay soldier who fights for equality with no problem, but prosecutes the straight soldier who fights against it. Or perhaps that was a bit spun. … To be fair, it sends home the straight soldier who fights for some freedoms, for some equalities, but not for the equality of the gay. He is the one — or she is the one — under this new proposition who will be discharged for disrupting the military. If you are not committed to perform with excellence as a United States soldier because you don’t believe in full equality, go home. If you are not honorable enough to fight without prejudice, go home. If you are not capable of keeping your oath to the Armed Forces to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic, and I will bear true faith and allegiance to do the same, unless there’s a gay soldier in my unit, then go home.

Or, moreover, if you serve this country, is it acceptable to be a cafeteria American soldier? Can you choose some things from the Constitution to put on your plate, but not others? A buffet, perhaps. I’m not talking about citizens — we have a right to grieve, to protest, we have a right to this rally — but I’m talking about soldiers. Should the military be allowed to treat Constitutional rights like a cafeteria? In the military, is it acceptable to be a cafeteria American? What I mean to say is, should soldiers and the government be able to pick and choose what we are fighting for in the Constitution or who we are fighting for? I wasn’t aware of this ambiguity in our Constitution. I thought the Constitution was ultimate. I thought equality was non-negotiable. And, let’s say, if the government can pick and choose who they’re fighting for, as exemplified in laws like “don’t ask, don’t tell,” shouldn’t we as Americans be made aware of this imbalance? Shouldn’t it be made clear to the citizens of this country, before we go to war, shouldn’t I be made aware ahead of time that some of us are just not included in that fight? “We’re going to war for you and you and you and you, but not you, because you’re gay.” You can risk your life for this country, but in the end, you’re not fighting for yourself; you’re fighting for straight people. … You are not included. You are not included when we say “equal.” You are not even fully included when we say “freedom.”

I’m here today in this park, in Maine, to say that, if the Senate and the president are not going to repeal this “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, perhaps they should be more clear with us about who the military is fighting for, who our tax dollars are supporting and, ultimately, how much does the prime rib cost? Because I thought this was an “all you can eat” buffet. This equality stuff, I thought equality meant everyone. But apparently, for certain value meals, for certain civil rights, I have to pay extra, because I’m gay. I’m allowed to stand in a line next to other men and women, I’m allowed to get shot at and shoot a gun to protect myself and my nation, but when it’s time to order my meal, when it’s time to benefit from the freedoms of the Constitution that I protect and fight for, I have to pay extra. I shouldn’t have to pay extra. I should have the ability, the opportunity, the right to enjoy the same rights — the same piece of meat — that my fellow soldiers, fellow straight soldiers, already have included in their Meal of Rights. It’s prime rib, it’s the same size, it’s the same grade, the same cost, at wholesale cost, and it’s in the Constitution.

My name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta. I am an American citizen, to the senate, to Americans, to Senator Olympia Snowe, Senator Susan Collins — both from Maine — and Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts. Equality is the prime rib of America. Equality is the prime rib of what we stand for as a nation. And I don’t get to enjoy the greatest cut of meat that my country has to offer. Are you listening? Shouldn’t everyone deserve the right to wear the same meat dress that I did? Repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” or go home. Go home. Thank you.

Sharjah: Air Outpost (1937)

This fascinating early documentary by Paul Rotha and narrated by Stuart Legg describes an Imperial Airways flight landing in Sharjah, in today’s United Arab Emirates, in 1937. The plane is a Handley Page HP42 biplane.

Although Dubai (home of Emirates Airlines) and Abu Dhabi (home of Etihad) are more famous today, Sharjah was one of the first airports in the region and had an RAF presence for many years. The airport was a stop-over between Basra in Iraq and Karachi in Pakistan for planes flying from the UK to India and Australia. At the time of this movie, it took four days just to get from London to Sharjah, since planes were much slower and did not fly at night.

The video appeared via The National, a UAE-based paper, in a June 2010 article “When Sharjah Ruled The Skies.” The article has a link to a full-screen version of the video.

Title: : 24 hours at the airport and city of Sharjah on the Persian Gulf. Made with the cooperation of Imperial Airways.

There are 25,000 miles of air routes in the British Empire. The safety and comfort of these routes depends largely on a network of over 80 airports, scattered through four continents.

Ground services for fuelling and overhauling aircraft, for collecting and sending out weather reports by radio, for handling freight and mail, and for providing accommodation for passengers of every nationality are an essential factor of modern flying. Many of these airports have been built in the most remote parts of the world, often hundreds of miles from the nearest source of supplies.

Such an airport is Sharjah, on the south coast of the Persian Gulf, midway between Basra and Karachi, a section of the Indian-Australian route which crosses the marshes of the Euphrates delta, the sun-baked deserts of Arabia, and the barren wastes of Baluchistan. 1700 miles of desolate and almost uninhabited country, over which our airliners fly as safely and regularly as we take our daily ride to the office.

Sharjah is a hot and desolate spot on the edge of the south Arabian desert. The airport has its own engineering shop, radio office and meteorological station. In charge is a European station superintendent.

The airport is built in the shape of a square fort, as a precaution against possible but improbable raids by wandering tribes of Bedouins.

Two miles distant across the glare of the desert is the Arab city. Until recently, a centre for pirates who were active up and down the Gulf. Sharjah is still peopled by Arabs of the same Jawazmi tribes, by religion fanatical Wahabbis, but today it is ruled over by a sheikh who is friendly to the British government.

To the city come camel caravans from Muscat and from distant Mukalla. They are bringing merchandise to trade in the market or for shipment by dhow to nearby ports along the coast and across the Gulf of Persia.
At the southern end of the city is the palace of the Sheikh, Sultan Bin Saqr, a huge medieval building with battlemented walls. Here in the gateway, a council is held each day to discuss local affairs and to settle disputes amongst the people.

The city has a population of some 15,000 Arabs, with a sprinkling of Indian and Persian merchants. Until recently, gun-running and slave-dealing with Africa were a profitable business. Today, the chief labour of the people is boat-building and pearl fishing.

The oyster banks of the Persian Gulf begin here at Sharjah and stretch 300 miles northward along the coast northward to Bahrain and Kuwait. They produce the finest pearls in the world. Cows and sheep, camels and goats are traded in the market. In the crowded and dark bazaars, lentils, coffee and rice, and dried eggs stained with cochineal are bought and sold.

Today as on every day, a merchant from the city is carrying to the airport across the burning desert such fresh food as the markets can provide.

“Hanno left Bahrain at 8:30 GMT. Captain Robinson in charge. With today’s wind she should be here about 5:30. If she’s at all late, Mr Smith, we’ll need flares and floodlights for night landing. Will you please have them ready?

“Yep. I’ll see that’s done.”

“And Wilcoxson, would you ask the aircraft for the names of the passenger?

“Avaz Khan. Six sahibs coming tonight. I’ll come and inspect the rooms in half an hour. Aeroplane coming half past five.”

“Bota cha, Sahib” (6:05)

At once preparations begin for the arrival of the airliner. She’s eastbound for India and Australia, four days out from England.

Provisions are bought from the storehouse to supplement local supplies. Living rooms are got ready and bed are made up, because Sharjah is a night stop.

All through the hot afternoon, donkeys bring cans of water from a well in the desert to fill the tank in the courtyard. Water to provide baths for the passengers and crew.

Arab merchants have brought parcels of pearls for shipment by air to dealers in Bombay and Calcutta. In the days before the air route, pearls were sent by sea or by long journey overland, but now native merchants always make use of the airliners to carry their wealth.

From now until the airliner departs at dawn tomorrow, the station superintendent will have no time for leisure. He must inspect the bedrooms to see that everything is in order; supervise the food, and attend to a multitude of other details.

Outside on the airport itself, another part of the organization is at work. A mobile beacon is wheeled into position. The six thousand-candlepower floodlight is uncovered in case the airline should be delayed by headwinds and so just fail to make Sharjah before sudden nightfall. Mobile petrol pumps are got ready, so that the refueling of the airliners tanks can begin as soon as she lands.

The radio office in the port keeps in contact touch with the airliner as she approaches down the Gulf.

“Met! Surface wind and barometric pressure, please!”

“Right! Surface wind Northwest- 8 miles. Barometric pressure 1014.2 millibars”

“Surface wind Northwest 8, pressure 1014.2. Thanks!”

In the cool of the evening, half an hour before sundown, everything at the airport is ready for the machine.

The Persian petrol boys pass the last few minutes with a game of cards. But their ears are alert for the aerodrome bell, which is the signal that airliner has been sighted.

“gello! gello!”

The Arab guard provided by the Sheikh turns out to open the gates of the compound. If anything should happen to the airliner, each man is liable to be punished in Arab fashion by the loss of eye or limb.
The Hanno has arrived. Passengers and crew alight. They gossip of the day’s run, of things and places seen on the way. This morning they were in Baghdad. Yesterday in Alexandria.

“The Coronation was marvelous….the Palladium has a new crazy show – the craziest one ever…the most nasty epidemic you could believe…my dear, I never seen such a… in my life.”

For those who live at the airport, they bring news of home 4000 miles away, but only four days distant by air.

“Warbler was in the club the night before I left. He asked to be remembered to you all. He’s in fine fettle, whacking the old ball further and straighter than ever.”

Each passenger is shown his room and handed a card giving the time of tomorrow’s departure, the places at which stops will be made for meals, and all other details of the day’s flight.
While those in the port are preparing to eat and sleep, the engineers out on the desert aerodrome are beginning to overhaul the airliner. In the gathering dusk and far into the night, the work of testing the engines and checking the controls goes on.

The first stage of tomorrow’s flight is a 450 mile hop across empty desert and shark-ridden seas.
Weather conditions must be discovered. A balloon is released from the roof of the meteorological station. A small electric light is attached to the tail and from observations of the speed of its ascent, the force and direction of the wind at different heights can be calculated. Information of the greatest importance to pilots on tomorrow’s run.
Dawn breaks over the desert.

The End

Rita Connolly: I Arise Today

The video has Rita Connolly singing a Shaun Davey song at the inauguration of Michael Higgins, the ninth president of Ireland in November 2011. The words are from the early St Patrick’s Breastplate via Cecil Frances Alexander and the German linguist and Celtic philologist Kuno Meyer.

Many Irish versions exist:

Críost liom, Críost romham, Críost ‘mo dhiaidh,
Críost ionam, Críost fúm, Críost os mo chionn,
Críost ar mo dheis, Críost ar mo chlé,
Críost i gcroí gach aoinne smaoiníos orm,
Críost i mbéal gach aoinne labhraíos liom,
Críost i ngach súil a dhearcas orm,
Críost i ngach cluais a chluineas mé.

———————–

Críost liom, Críost romham,
Críost i mo dhiaidh, Críost istigh ionam,
Críost fúm, Críost os mo chionn,
Críost ar mo lámh dheas, Críost ar mo chlé,

Críost i mo lúi dom, Críost i mo sheasamh,
Críost i ngach gcrói ag cuimhneamh orm,
Críost i ngach mbéal, Críost i ngach súil,
Críost i ngach cluas, a éisteann liom.

——-

Críost liom, Críost romham,
Críost im dhiadh,
Críost ar mo chion-sa, agus Críost fúm,
Críost ina chónai i mo chroí-se,
Críost fós ó dheas díom, Críost ó thuaidh.

An early version of the lyrics can be found at the University of California (Davis) website. A medieval Irish version can be found on Wikisource. The second video is unfortunately unaccredited and unattributed, but has interesting photos and lyrics.

Rita Connolly (singer): :
I arise today, through the strength of heaven;
light of sun, radiance of moon,
splendor of fire, speed of lightning,
swiftness of wind, depth of the sea,
stability of earth, firmness of rock.

I arise today, through God’s strength to pilot me;

God’s eye to look before me, God’s wisdom to guide me,
God’s way to lie before me, God’s shield to protect me,
from all who shall wish me ill, afar and a-near
alone and in a multitude.

Against every cruel merciless power
that may oppose my body and soul,

Christ with me, Christ before me,
Christ behind me, Christ in me,
Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ on my right, Christ on my left,
Christ when I lie down, Christ when I sit down,

Christ when I arise, Christ to shield me.

Christ in the heart of every one who thinks of me,

Christ in the mouth of every one who speaks of me,

I arise today…….